Big Bucks, Big Busts | 10 Expensive Stark Law Violations 2024

In 2024, doctors across the USA must know about the Stark Law, which is a strict law prohibiting healthcare providers and their close family members from referring patients to Medicare services.

Mr. Fortney (Pete) Stark introduced Stark Law, widely known as Physician Self-Referral Law, as a section of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act in 1989. Based on research, he expressed his concern over the financial interests of doctors and underlined the importance of protecting patients from unnecessary medical referrals.

Three primary aspects comprise the Stark Law: 

  1. The Anti-Kickback Statute 
  1. The False Claims Act
  2. The Federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law

    All of these sections are to protect patients from needless treatments and ensure that every doctor is fairly compensated for their services. Basically, a research study came into the spotlight, and it was observed that physicians get great monetary benefits by referring patients for clinical laboratory services. Moreover, they unnecessarily suggest more of these services, even though they are not needed.

Hence, the Federal Law was implemented to cover ten designated health services (DHS). The Stark Law governs and prohibits financial ties between any DHS healthcare provider who refers patients to the health service and submits claims to federal healthcare programs such as Medicare or Medicaid. The Stark Law and Regulations offer exceptions that allow financial interactions in extremely particular situations. 

The mentioned regulations can be applicable to any physician, hospital, or any sort of healthcare provider that secures compensation from federal healthcare programs such as Medicare, or Medicaid. It means Stark law applies to any healthcare services organization that provides related services to these programs.

Financial Consequences of Stark Law Violations

In contrast to the Anti-Kickback statute, the Stark Law does not require proof of intent to influence referrals. Physician self-referral law outlaws a civil penalty of $100,000 for each circumvention scheme, as well as $15,000 and 3x the amount of improper payments.

Violation TypePotential Penalties
Failure to Comply with Stark LawCivil monetary penalties – up to $25,000 per violation, fines, damages
Violating Anti-Kickback ProvisionsFines up to $100,000 per violation, imprisonment up to 5 years, exclusion from federal programs
Submitting False ClaimsCivil monetary penalties up to $11,000 per false claim, treble damages
UpcodingFines up to $11,000-$22000 per claim, 3x of overpayment 
Unbundling ServicesFines up to $11,000-$22000 per claim, 3x of overpayment 
Billing for Unnecessary ServicesFines up to $15,000 per service, repayment of overpayments
Failure to Maintain Proper DocumentationCivil monetary penalties – up to $15,000 per violation, fines, legal action
Physician Self-ReferralCivil monetary penalties – up to $15,000 per violation, 3x of improper payment received, exclusion
Improper Financial RelationshipsCivil monetary penalties – up to $15,000 per violation,  3x of improper payment received, exclusion
Non-compliant Physician Compensation ArrangementsCivil monetary penalties – up to $15,000 per violation, fines, legal action

Ten Expensive Stark Law Violations 2024

According to a report from a law firm, Stark law violations significantly increased in 2023, and the Justice Department recovered a massive penalty. One of the most expensive penalties was imposed on the Indianapolis-based Community Health Network, which paid $345 million. The allegation was based on misleading information and extra billing to facilitate doctors.

We’ll now discuss the top 10 costly and serious breaches of the law.

1.       Kickbacks

Kickbacks usually stand for giving or getting illegal incentives or monetary compensation in exchange for referrals. However, the word “kickback,” used as a definition of the anti-kickback statute, is established as “any item or service for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal healthcare program.”

The Stark Law (42 USC § 1395nn) imposes bans on “referrals” of particular services, including laboratory tests, hospital treatments, prescription drugs, and durable medical equipment that are regarded as “designated health services.” In addition, Stark Law only refers to physician relationships.

2.       Physician Self-Referral

The main component of the Stark law is the physician’s self-referral, which forbids a physician to refer his/her Medicare and Medicaid patients for certain designated health services (DHS) to institutions that have at least a financial relationship with the physician, except when the determined exceptions apply. Medical professionals would be shielded from lawsuits related to referrals with financial incentives for a specific provider through this regulation.

Let’s just assume that a doctor owns the lab and can refer patients to the lab just to add up sales. The purpose of the law is to ensure that patients get even-handed, transparent, and honest treatment by prohibiting doctors from influencing decisions that will put the latter’s gain on the front line.

3.       Billing for Medically Unnecessary Services

When a physician charges for a service or procedure that is not needed for medical treatment, this conflicts with the Stark Law, and it will be counted as healthcare fraud. Besides raising the costs of healthcare, it can also endanger the patient’s health with the use of futile medical overshoots. Healthcare providers must ensure that all treatment carried out by them is related to the patient’s disease and is fair.

4.       Upcoding

The most common fraud used to deceive federal programs is upcoding. This involves billing through the wrong code for a more expensive service than what was provided to the patient. This deceptive practice raises the bar for healthcare costs and can result in more payments from federal health programs and insurance companies.

Additionally, physicians may utilize specific modifier codes to indicate that discrete extra services were rendered during a patient visit. Assigning such a modifier code that indicates extra services were rendered when they were covered by the standard code for the patient visit is a popular form of upcoding.

5.       Unbundling

When a medical billing specialist or healthcare provider separately charges for services that are typically performed together as part of a single treatment plan, it is unbundling. This fraudulent practice inflates the reimbursement rates. Healthcare practices must ensure that their billing practices comply with coding guidelines and accurately reflect the services rendered to patients.

Everything has both positive and negative sides. While technological advancements simplify the billing process, they also facilitate unbundling and upcoding. By using EHR, physicians can easily retrieve the patient’s previous history and mention those services in the current treatment note, which misleads the payer as the patient diagnoses and treats every listed condition.

6.       False Claim

Submitting false or fraudulent documents to be paid for by Medicare, Medicaid, or any other government health-related program is a big mistake. Billing for services not rendered, misrepresenting the kind of services provided, and knowingly submitting purposefully incorrect information are some of the ways how violations can occur.  

7.       Improper Joint Ventures

The Stark Law provides specific rules for physicians’ ownership, investment, and management of a healthcare entity in the context of joint ventures and other business partnerships.

Inappropriate joint ventures in the aspect of Stark Law violations are the result of healthcare entities’ activities connected with physicians that contradict the law’s terms related to physician ownership and investments in healthcare facilities. These violations may have considerable legal and economic implications that influence everyone associated with them.

8.       Failure to Maintain Proper Documentation

Medical practices must ensure accurate documentation with respect to compliance with healthcare regulations and the integrity of healthcare facilities. Failure to maintain proper documentation, even with the help of medical billing services California, can lead to legal and financial complications associated with Stark law. 

Under the Stark Law, healthcare providers are required to maintain complete documentation that supports the nature and scope of financial relationships between physicians and healthcare entities. The documentation is also used to demonstrate the requirements and appropriateness of referrals for designated health services.

9.       Compensation Arrangements Violation

In compensation arrangements, Stark Law violations happen when healthcare organizations do not comply with regulations on financial relationships between physicians and healthcare entities as set out by the Stark Law. 

The Stark Law does not allow payments for referrals of designated health services reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid, unless exceptions apply. Breaches in payment arrangements frequently comprise misappropriate financial awards that might trigger excessive use of healthcare services or undermine patient treatment.

10.   Failure to Comply with Stark Law Exceptions

Stark law exceptions can be very complicated due to the diverse types of exceptions. It includes provisions for physicians to hold diagnostic or treatment procedures, provided such services are performed in the doctor’s office. 

People simply let doctors choose places for patients to go if the referral makes sense, for example, if there are no other hospitals or centers presently available. These exceptions are accompanied by many requirements for doctors to ensure that they are not reaping undue advantages from the system.

If physicians don’t follow the rules of Stark Law flexibilities, they could be in trouble. They could be required to make some payments or even lose their license for a medical practice. Furthermore, it may also damage patients if doctors make decisions based on money and not what’s actually favorable for them.


Ultimately, we had an overview of Stark Law, and it is clear that adherence to Stark Law is both a legal requirement and a moral obligation for physicians throughout the United States. This law was designed to protect the patient’s well-being and guarantee fair payment for healthcare services.

By 2024, the breaches of Stark law will demonstrate the bigger picture of non-compliance. The possible financial penalties for not following the rules are substantial. Healthcare providers can be penalized in various ways, such as through monetary fines and being barred from federal programs, for violations like lacking proper documentation, engaging in inappropriate financial relationships, and overbilling for services.

Many instances that have been in the spotlight lately from a legal point of view indicate that the financial consequences of committing Stark Law violations can be very serious. In some cases, the penalties reached hundreds of millions of dollars. This extends beyond monetary penalties and may bring up legal action, reputation destruction, and patient harm.

Eventually, the Stark Law still does not attempt to evade the penalties—it serves to preserve the honor of medical care, strengthen public assurance in the healthcare system, and make sure that excellent services are going to be accessible to people.

Get In Touch!

Recent Blogs

Scroll to Top

Accelerate Your Revenue Cycle Partner With The Best Doctor Management Service USA

subscribe our newsletter